# Nodes 1.9 with GVA part desynchronized

**URL:** https://forum.duniter.org/t/nodes-1-9-with-gva-part-desynchronized/12527
**Category:** Duniter-v1
**Tags:** duniter
**Created:** [29 September 2024 22:35 UTC](https://forum.duniter.org/t/nodes-1-9-with-gva-part-desynchronized/12527 "2024-09-29T22:35:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vjrj](https://forum.duniter.org/user_avatar/forum.duniter.org/vjrj/32/8487_2.png) [@vjrj](https://forum.duniter.org/u/vjrj)
#### Post date: [29 September 2024 22:35 UTC](https://forum.duniter.org/t/nodes-1-9-with-gva-part-desynchronized/12527/1 "2024-09-29T22:35:08Z")

</div>

Hi there,

For some days I detected that some duniter nodes with GVA (1.9) are not well synchronized, but only the GVA part.

That is, if you query the current block via BMA is bigger than the the block in a GVA query.

Only two GVA enabled nodes are in sync (in the GVA part) with the BMA nodes, [https://g1.brussels.ovh](https://g1.brussels.ovh) (@Nicolas80) and [https://g1.copylaradio.com](https://g1.copylaradio.com) (@Frederic_Renault).

I’ve just installed a v1 duniter node ([https://duniter-v1.comunes.net](https://duniter-v1.comunes.net)) and I started to see that the GVA part is returning a lower block that the BMA part.

Cesium capture:

 ![image](https://forum.duniter.org/uploads/default/original/2X/0/0098305d58b52449e0842dd1ab250c52637ebbb3.jpeg)

G1nkgo capture (a minute later):

 ![image](https://forum.duniter.org/uploads/default/original/2X/e/ec7aa90e76312057cc0b3056a5e752fff249fe4c.jpeg)

GVA Playground query (after writing this, still with the same block):

 ![image](https://forum.duniter.org/uploads/default/original/2X/e/eb0591f792dc37586d90066ffa3a7354f0ff2309.png)

Some GVA enabled nodes were all in an old block for many days (with the BMA in sync):

 ![image](https://forum.duniter.org/uploads/default/original/2X/0/0d5b16125235928022488d3139c91aeaf2577d7e.jpeg)

Any idea of what’s is going on?

PS: Thanks to @elmau to trying to have a look on this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![HugoTrentesaux](https://forum.duniter.org/user_avatar/forum.duniter.org/hugotrentesaux/32/6396_2.png) [@HugoTrentesaux](https://forum.duniter.org/u/HugoTrentesaux)
#### Post date: [2 October 2024 14:21 UTC](https://forum.duniter.org/t/nodes-1-9-with-gva-part-desynchronized/12527/2 "2024-10-02T14:21:07Z")

</div>

Thanks for the detailed report 🙂  
I have no idea of what’s going on. Duniter 1.9 will be in beta forever and bugs like this or [Bug balance DB GVA](https://forum.duniter.org/t/bug-balance-db-gva/9805) have very low chance to find a contributor who wants to have a deeper look.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vjrj](https://forum.duniter.org/user_avatar/forum.duniter.org/vjrj/32/8487_2.png) [@vjrj](https://forum.duniter.org/u/vjrj)
#### Post date: [5 October 2024 20:38 UTC](https://forum.duniter.org/t/nodes-1-9-with-gva-part-desynchronized/12527/3 "2024-10-05T20:38:15Z")

</div>

At the end, and after several sync retries and with patience, we are all in sync again.  
 ![image](https://forum.duniter.org/uploads/default/original/2X/3/3a7398610591efd1e6f2fe4da2084b4dfbf4c5f1.png)

Thanks and sorry for the v1 noise.