This is just to propose some potential UX improvements of Duniter vs other cryptosystems.
Since the WoT is already used to verify members and they have a public username it might be interesting to allow to send payments using a “member.username” with one of those per member.
More so, it might be interesting to allow the registration of domain names for other entities trough simple wallets with a yearly fee. This could allow Duniter currencies to send payments to “com.buisnessname”, “org.foundation”, “coop.farmersmarket” or “country.storename”.
The second proposal would be account recovery if “member.username” is a member then the member could lose acces to their funds if either:
- The key is compromised
- Access to the key is lost
- Retrograde amnesia affects the recall of either the password or secret id
Then some rules might be put in place to allow a majority of those the member trusted to transfer the funds to a new key. (Or change the key of the is “member.username” to a new key with access to the funds)
This change would improve UX in general and would be more forgiving of eventualities.