The same goes for the UD in regard to Ğ1s. The UD is simply a different scale, but what is stored and exchanged, the “units” are actually Ğ1s. The specificity of Libre Currencies is that at any point in time, the total UDs is a proportion of the money mass distributed equally among a population. So it is a fixed frame of reference as the proportion always stays the same. But again, it is only a different scale representing the same objects: the Ğ1s.
I hope this will help you understand that when storing things, you should always consider the Ğ1s that are stored, and you can either count them in absolute numbers of Ğ1s or in relative numbers of UDs. Over time, 1 UD represents an exponentially growing number of Ğ1s.
Could Duniter Desktop calc 1 DU, and know what a good would cost?
The program is, the website gchange.fr is not as it is reserved for exchanging in Ğ1. Truthfully, it should be called g1change.fr
The desktop gchange and gannounce apps can support any currencies without modification?
@cgeek is there any form of documentation on how to create a block 0?
He didn’t willed to answer.
@DaniellMesquita one piece of advice that comes to my mind: if you don’t understand how to create a block 0 from the code, then maybe it is not yet time for you to create ĞBrazil (or maybe you should find a nodejs developer who does understand)
Not interested to create a coin for a country.
As @Junidev said:
Yes but the counterpart is that the biggest the community the smaller the security.
Simply put, its much simpler to prepare an attack in a larger community.
Also, I don’t use technical and special knowledge when creating a thing.
The parameters for the WOT (number of certifications, various timings, distance to referring members etc.) must be chosen very carefully in order to guarantee some level of security of the WOT
Distance to referring members would be based on state/province’s region size in population.
And these are the parameters that mathematically restrict the size of the WOT
What are the estimated settings for a region with ~3 million habitants?
As far as a currency is concerned, one million people seems to be a good number: not too low (under that, the economic zone is not varied enough and not large enough to be of significance) and not too large (too large poses problems in terms of security, as @Junidev pointed out, but also in terms of some people being too far from each other to really interact economically).
That’s exactly what I’m pointing here: Une monnaie pour seulement une région d'une province - #4 by jytou
So you saying I should create a cryptocurrency for the whole Brazil, doesn’t makes sense.
The question that can be asked is “why be limited to a region”? When the Ğ1 was launched the question was asked to make a single currency or full of small currencies, one by region. One currency per region is to limit its economic impact. And people do not want to waste time with something that has a weak impact. It would seem rather better to make a change for Brazil, so that it shines more.
It seems like a weird change on your mind.